• Increase font size
  • Default font size
  • Decrease font size
  • default color
  • green color
  • red color

Progressive Labor Party



Thursday
Dec 03rd
War
Rulers ‘Debate’ War: Afghanistan or Pakistan? Both Are Killers PDF Print
Saturday, 10 October 2009 20:31
The Obama administration’s internal debate about U.S. troop strength in Afghanistan reflects one inter-imperialist conflict within another still graver one. The first involves the struggle between U.S. and Russia over neighboring Turkmenistan’s vast energy reserves. The other is nothing less than the global dogfight for capitalist supremacy among the U.S., Europe, Russia, and China, with emerging nuclear powers Pakistan, India, and Iran in supporting roles.
Read more...
 
Carter’s 1980 Doctrine Basis for Current Oil Wars PDF Print
Saturday, 04 July 2009 15:20

The specter of a Russian-Iranian strategic coalition bridging through Afghanistan has haunted Western imperialists for almost two centuries. The current U.S. view dates back to Carter’s 1980 State of the Union speech, when he warned

Iranian leaders that “the real danger to their nation lies in the north, in the Soviet Union and from the Soviet troops now in Afghanistan....” He continued:

“The region which is now threatened by Soviet troops in Afghanistan is of great strategic importance: It contains more than two-thirds of the world’s exportable oil. The Soviet effort to dominate Afghanistan has brought Soviet military forces to within 300 miles of the Indian Ocean and close to the Straits of Hormuz, through which most of the world’s oil must flow. [Editor’s note: The straits are a 35-mile-wide passage between Iran and U.S.-armed Oman.] The Soviet Union is now attempting to consolidate a strategic position, therefore, that poses a grave threat to the free movement of Middle East oil.... An attempt by any outside force to gain control of the Persian Gulf region will be regarded as an assault on the vital interests of the United States of America, and such an assault will be repelled by any means necessary, including military force.”

Carter was essentially declaring the same war that Obama is now waging in Iraq and Afghanistan — and that will logically expand into Iran.

Iran: Missing Cornerstone of U.S.-U.K. Energy Empire

Third in the world in oil reserves and second in natural gas, Iran commands key Persian Gulf and Caspian Sea supply routes. Allied control of the “Persian Corridor” and its underlying crude helped the U.S. and the Soviet Union defeat the Nazis in World War II. In 1953, after Iran elected a Soviet-tilting government, President Mossadegh threatened to nationalize the British-owned Anglo-Iranian Oil Company. Shortly, a CIA-led coup placed the dictatorial Shah on the throne. Anglo-Iranian, now called British Petroleum, remained in Iran, but only as a junior partner to U.S. giant Exxon-Mobil’s forerunners.

For decades, the Pentagon armed the Shah’s regime, which served the U.S. both as an oil source and a hired gun protecting the eastern flank of the Mid-east treasure trove, with grand prize Saudi Arabia at its center. Israel policed the western side.  In 1979, two events brought this regional racket crashing down. The Soviets, by then fully capitalist and imperialist, invaded Afghanistan. Meanwhile, Iranian Islamist nationalists, backed by the pro-Soviet, phony communist Tudeh party, deposed the Shah.

The U.S. countered both militarily and ideologically. In Afghanistan, Washington supported anti-Soviet Islamic warriors, ultimately the base of al Qaeda and the Taliban. Jimmy Carter declared that the Mid-east was of vital U.S. interest (see box above), meaning that Exxon Mobil’s exclusive oil and gas rights would be defended by U.S. troops. Carter launched the Navy’s Persian Gulf Rapid Deployment Force, which has grown into the Pentagon’s Central Command. Today CENTCOM, with the slaughter of millions of Iraqis, Afghans, and Pakistanis under its belt, has the mandate to plan and execute future assaults on Iran.

Back in 1979, U.S. rulers demonized Iran’s new Islamist regime by provoking the “hostage crisis.” David Rockefeller and Henry Kissinger brought the ailing ex-Shah to New York for medical treatment, knowing full well that it would trigger a response in Teheran. Outraged Iranian militants retaliated by taking hostage 50 U.S. diplomats and spies at the U.S. embassy. As a result, Iran’s mullah-Tudeh alliance was branded as a terrorist rogue state — a label that clings to the clerics to this day and will serve to justify a possible U.S. invasion.

 
Killer McChrystal in Ivy League Club Helping Obama Carry Out War and Fascism PDF Print
Thursday, 21 May 2009 15:52

For the bosses, Obama favorite McChrystal’s ties to U.S. imperialism’s main faction round out his resumé as mass murderer. The liberal Brookings Institution calls him a “superstar.” Just before he won his general’s stars, he served as military fellow at the Rockefeller-led Council on Foreign Relations, the rulers’ most influential think-tank.

McChrystal did a year-long stint at Harvard University’s Belfer Center. Belfer, part of Harvard’s Kennedy School of Government, boasts a long roster of members aiding the Obama regime, not only in military matters but also in his anti-working-class economic “restructuring” laying off tens of thousands of auto workers. This includes Defense Under-secretaries Ashton Carter and CNAS boss Michele Flournoy, banking czar Paul Volcker, Mid-East envoy Dennis Ross, National Security aide Samantha Power (who, while working for Obama in 2008, revealed his pledge to leave Iraq as a phony campaign promise), NATO ambassador Ivo Daalder, economic advisor Martin Feldstein, Homeland Security guru Rand Beers and others.

 
Rulers Use Obama to Widen Afghan-Pakistan Ground War PDF Print
Thursday, 21 May 2009 15:51

The dominant imperialist wing of U.S. capitalists is pressing Obama to emphasize ground warfare over air strikes in the widening Afghanistan-Pakistan battleground. The shift spells higher death tolls on all sides and even more U.S. troops than Obama’s surge of 21,000. Current U.S. strategy targeting al Qaeda and the Taliban with pilotless “drone” aircraft is unintentionally swelling enemy ranks.

Read more...
 
PLP Anti-War Marchers Challenge Liberals, Phony ‘Leftists’ PDF Print
Thursday, 26 March 2009 23:25

NEW YORK CITY, April 22 — A multi-racial group of PLP members, including a young new member and a Party friend, traveled yesterday with a local anti-war group to the anti-war march on the Pentagon in Washington D.C. The marchers were predominantly white.

Read more...
 
<< Start < Prev 1 2 3 4 5 Next > End >>

Page 1 of 5

What We Fight For

Progressive Labor Party (PLP) fights to smash capitalism -- wage slavery. While the bosses and their mouthpieces claim "communism is dead:" capitalism is the real failure for billions all over the world. Capitalism returned to the Soviet Union and China because socialism failed to wipe out many aspects of the profit system, like wages and division of labor.

Capitalism inevitably leads to wars. PLP organizes workers, students and soldiers to turn these wars into a revolution for communism -- the dictatorship of the proletariat. This fight requires a mass Red Army led by the communist PLP.

Communism means working collectively to build a society where sharing is based on need. We will abolish work for wages, money and profits. Everyone will share in society's benefits and burdens.

Communism means abolishing racism and the concept of race.

Communism means abolishing the special oppression of women workers.

Communism means abolishing nations and nationalism. One International working class, one world, one Party.

Communism means the Party leads every aspect of society. For this to work, millions of workers -- eventually everyone -- must become communist organizers. Join Us!

LATEST "CHALLENGE"


Issue for 11/11/09

Click here for the PDF or here HTML format.